British Journalism Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hagerty, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
British Journalism Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, 56-64 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0956474806071119

The Post man’s still delivering

Bill Hagerty

BJR editor Hagerty interviews Leonard Downie Jr, the Washington Post's executive editor for the past 15 years. He is the longest serving editor of any major newspaper in the United States, yet remains largely anonymous outside the industry. Downie's views on the British media include: "...there is a general tendency in the British media [for writers] to be essayists rather than reporters. There's a lot of detail that doesn't appear in most British reporting - it's more impressionistic, more analytical, and it's less deep and less facts-seeking. I particularly admire the proper analysis and the level of intellectual engagement, which is very high... But one thing that... disturbs me is the whole lobby system - the conspiring with officialdom to produce stories that are almost impossible to trace the origins of and to be misleading to the public as a result. It makes government more opaque rather than more transparent..."

And he also observes: "The depths of investigative reporting and accountability reporting here, and the premium on accuracy, is paramount. In Britain, the Daily and Sunday Telegraph, for example, are both very aggressive newspapers right now, but every time they report something that interests us, the first thing we have to do is check it out. Just because they've reported it doesn't mean it's true. I would hate for people to see The Washington Post that way."


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?