Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
British Journalism Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Editorial

The State we're in

As the result of an action brought by Max Mosley, son of Sir Oswald, against the News of the World, the media face another reading of the law regarding privacy. The BJR argues, as has journalist John Pilger, that "The lost issue is to protect the public from the state, not the press" and urges the creation of a press industry-wide council to examine the issue of privacy and intrusion. It could take on a role similar to that of a parliamentary select committee, investigating every aspect of privacy and its preservation against the depredations of the state the media, with its findings stimulating a serious debate not just among politicians, but among members of the public, too.

British Journalism Review, Vol. 19, No. 3, 3-4 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0956474808097342


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?