<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com">
<title>British Journalism Review recent issues</title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com</link>
<description>British Journalism Review RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>British Journalism Review</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0956-4748</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/5?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/14?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/25?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/32?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/33?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/39?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/46?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/47?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/52?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/58?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/66?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/72?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/79?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/82?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/85?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/87?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/89?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/91?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/93?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/94?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/96?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/5?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/10?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/15?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/22?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/23?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/32?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/33?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/41?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/48?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/57?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/63?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/69?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/74?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/75?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/77?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/79?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/81?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/83?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/85?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/87?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/5?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/11?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/27?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/33?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/39?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/51?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/56?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/57?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/63?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/68?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/69?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/80?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/81?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/83?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/85?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/87?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/89?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/91?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/93?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/95?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/6?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/7?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/17?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/24?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/25?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/33?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/38?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/45?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/51?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/54?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/60?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/61?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/66?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/73?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/81?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/83?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/86?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/89?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/91?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/93?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/95?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://bjr.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>British Journalism Review</title>
<url>http://bjr.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[British Journalism Review: Food for thought]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p> The new BJR survey on Trust and the Media shows that a large numbers of readers and                 viewers clearly don't care whether they are told the truth or not, and are satisfied                 with bubblegum publications and programming. Others may expect to be lied to: the                 low turnout at elections and general disaffection with politics give some support to                 that theory. Still others, it is clear from the survey, believe that they are being                 short-changed by cynical media and are ready to abandon their connection with them.                 And they are free to do so because, for the first time, there is an easily available                 alternative to the way news is diffused and received on paper and over the airwaves.                 Anyone with access to the internet can now see the raw material of news and                 construct his or her own version of events. It may be crude and misleading; it may                 lack the elegance of the well-crafted story; it may not have the wisdom gained from                 years of reporting experience; it may contain various kinds of lunacy, from paranoid                 racism to a fear of little green men. But if the news media cannot provide something                 nourishing and non-toxic to compete with the web, sales will continue to plunge-                 and so will reputations.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808094192</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[British Journalism Review: Food for thought]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/5?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On the road to self-destruction]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/5?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Professor Steven Barnett reports that a new BJR survey shows public confidence in                 journalism is still falling. "What ought to worry all journalists is the massive                 slide in trust, relative to other organisations or groups, since this question was                 first asked five years ago", he writes. The poll reveals that print journalism's                 performance is not quite as bad as the commercial broadcasters' but is on a par with                 the BBC. The trust figures for broadsheet journalists have declined 22 per cent over                 five years; those for local journalists are down 20 per cent and those for the                 mid-market titles down 18 per cent. This last group is the biggest loser in terms of                 the relative decline: while five years ago journalists on the mid-market titles were                 being ranked just below the middle of the table, their trust rating now languishes                 just above their red-top colleagues. The decline in trust extends beyond journalism                 to virtually every group in the list shown to those taking part in the survey, in                 particular public sector occupations such as police, teachers and NHS managers.                 Journalism's decline cannot, therefore, be seen in isolation from a more widespread                 phenomenon of declining faith. For an occupation that is supposed to deal in truth,                 however, and for which accuracy lies at the heart of the various codes of                 professional conduct, the scale and speed of the decline in trust is a serious                 issue.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barnett, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808094193</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On the road to self-destruction]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>13</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/14?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dangerous obsession]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/14?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p> In an extract from his new book, the head of journalism and publishing at City                 University, London, comments: "There are important issues about the way the media                 conducts itself, but they're not important because we need to build 'trust'. Trust                 is a shoddy yardstick. It doesn't gauge truth, it gauges what looks close to the                 truth: verisimilitude - not a word to use after a late night out. As journalists, we                 tend to sneer at intellectualism and value pragmatism. If broadcasters are going to                 take their editorial policies seriously, then they need to get over the current                 obsession with 'trust' and engage with the moral contradictions and intellectual                 problems at the heart of those policies. And that might require a little more                 philosophy and a little less marketing." </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monck, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808094194</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dangerous obsession]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Knighthoods errant]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/19?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p> With the Queen's birthday honours imminent, a distinguished writer questions whether                 working journalists should accept such rewards. McCrystal writes: We cannot claim                 that our virtues blossom on our natures or our work as radiantly, unselfconsciously,                 and inevitably as the flower on the hawthorn bough. Those government and                 parliamentary people who claim otherwise by "honouring" certain journalists may be                 classified as a tribunal of mediocrity. And what does that make us? Should our                 sights be on a gong and its intimations of flunkeyism and hypocrisy, or on the                 morass of misery and sweated labour at the bottom of society; a morass sustaining an                 edifice of competitive commerce as greedy as it is merciless? And he concludes: I                 cannot see that a scrupulous effort to maintain distance between the journalist and                 the state should not be regarded as crucial to effective journalism and an easy                 conscience. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCrystal, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808094195</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Knighthoods errant]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>24</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/25?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In a different league]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/25?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p> The fiftieth anniversary of the Munich air crash recalled journalist giants of the                 past. But today is a true golden age for football writers, claims a star columnist.                 Comparing the football writers of today with those of past decades, he writes: "The                 football specialist writers of today have a desperately difficult job. They are                 faced with the competition of wall-to-wall, forelock-tugging, blissfully uncritical                 satellite television coverage. Instead of living in the same streets as the people                 they cover, the football reporter barely exist on the same planet, since £5m a year                 buys a privileged place in a gated community or on a country estate. They have to                 contend with the concepts of product placement and copy approval, as well as the                 odious machinations of a platoon of grasping agents. By and large, they have little                 contact with the players unless they happen to write a major star's life story,                 which itself will be sanitised in the interests of commercial blandness. And yet, in                 this writer's opinion, they cope superbly; perhaps better than their predecessors                 could have imagined. Aware that television will inevitably set the tone, they work                 harder on difficult issues, they explore different avenues, they search for the                 reality behind the manufactured image." </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collins, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808094196</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In a different league]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>31</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/32?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quotes of the Quarter]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/32?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190021401</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quotes of the Quarter]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>32</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/33?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Always on a Sunday]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/33?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p> Many newspaper analysts and media commentators have dismissed the national Sunday                 market as a disaster area beyond regeneration. Preston disagrees and points out that                 although circulations are falling in the Sunday market, the quality press is not                 faring badly: "In March 2008, quality Sunday sales were recorded as 2.04 per cent                 down on March 2007: better by far than mid-market and red-top Sundays (down 4.7 per                 cent and 3.81 per cent respectively) and better than quality dailies, down 2.51 per                 cent. It's not a dismaying result when you remember that Sundays are traditionally                 priced far higher than their Saturday in-house competitors." A brave proprietor                 wishing to launch a new newspaper should go for Sunday, perhaps with Saturday as an                 added extra, Preston argues. "Print perhaps only one set of magazines and add-ons to                 cover the weekend. And deal with the run of the week exactly how young readers in                 particular are tackling it: by logging on and surfing around the whole puzzle on                 paper for those with the time and inclination to think and brood... If you can marry                 the swiftness and cheapness on demand of the web with the relative permanency of                 print, then you have a total package." </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Preston, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808094197</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Always on a Sunday]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>38</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/39?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Europe: media freedom in retreat]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/39?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p> While some member states violently obstruct media freedom, European Union                 manipulation conceals truths. Horsley, media freedom representative of the                 Association of European Journalists and a former BBC foreign correspondent, unveils                 a disingenuous strategy. He writes: "The many-sided assaults on media freedom have                 compounded what was already a complex and daunting task to report Europe adequately                 and journalists still struggle to find the vocabulary to describe the unique hybrid                 nature of the European Union... It is time that national governments came clean about                 the realities of the EU, the fierce national rivalries that are still played out                 inside its meetings, and the limits of their own ability to manage its huge                 administrative and governmental machine. It is time, too, for the media to stop                 being embarrassed about Europe and to find new ways of telling a complex and vitally                 important story. For that, one of the first tasks must be to win back the media                 freedom and independence that has been dangerously eroded." </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Horsley, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808094198</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Europe: media freedom in retreat]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>45</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>39</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/46?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The way we were]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/46?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190021501</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The way we were]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>46</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>46</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/47?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[It's more fun on the `Dark Side']]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/47?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p> Journalism has historically belittled public relations as being profligate and soft.                 But life is better in PR-land says a business journalist who crossed over:                 "Certainly, my lifestyle and work in public relations is far more enjoyable than my                 last job in journalism, which became a bit of a battle not only over expenses but                 also time spent at my desk and words produced. In PR, these things are not issues.                 Results are the only measure of success and if you get good ones then no one gives a                 damn about how many hours you spend in the office." And he concludes: "Journalists                 who've used up their expense budgets and spent all their own meagre wages but need                 to entertain an important contact contact me from time to time. Would I mind joining                 in and picking up the tab to save the hack's embarrassment? Of course not. All part                 of the service. Do I want anything in return? Maybe, but nothing earth shattering. A                 little mention here, a non-mention there. Is that unethical? In the modern world, I                 don't think so." </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCrystal, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808094199</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[It's more fun on the `Dark Side']]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>51</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/52?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Arwyr lleol: (That's Welsh for local heroes)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/52?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The papurau bro (Welsh language local newspapers) break all the rules in helping to                 keep the Welsh language alive - but is their revolution running out of steam? From a                 small seed sown in Cardiff in 1973, some 56 publications still exist, which implies                 they've earned their place in contemporary Wales. Yet they break every rule of                 design, of news values and competition. They rarely seek advertising and few have                 paid staff to produce the goods. They are furiously independent and regard the                 advent of "new" - for which read "relatively old" - technology with a perhaps not                 altogether healthy degree of scepticism... Yet the papers are being dragged slowly                 into the 21st century - some now have their own web presence. But even if, together,                 they form the largest single readership of anything published in the Welsh language,                 their future is not guaranteed. Research shows that 60 per cent of papers fear for                 their future. Their continued antipathy towards anything commercial and anything                 that might constitute a "scoop", plus that unbending independence, could spell doom                 for something that has been nothing short of a phenomenon.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hughes, G. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808094200</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Arwyr lleol: (That's Welsh for local heroes)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>57</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>52</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/58?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Myth, Jung and the McC women]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/58?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Express group libelled the McCann family. The media vilified Heather McCartney.                 To explain why, a student in psychiatry visits Carl Jung's couch: "The print                 barrange against both women was unmatched in its prolonged intensity even by the                 intermittent coverage of jailed (now dead) Moors murderer Myra Hindley. Why? What is                 it about the portrayal of these two women by the news media that elicits such a                 powerful, pervasive and usually negative response?" Anslow continues: "These                 resilient and recurring patterns were identified by the influential but                 controversial Swiss psychologist and thinker Carl Jung (1875-1961) and labelled                 'archetypes'. In his Collected Works, Jung writes: 'There are types of situations                 and types of figures that repeat themselves endlessly and have a corresponding                 meaning'... Jungians would claim that consumers of news reports respond to the same                 collectively unconscious contents as the journalists who gather, edit and present                 the stories. Thus, unconsciously, they expect shared, archetypal, embedded patterns                 to assert themselves in the reportage."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anslow, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808094201</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Myth, Jung and the McC women]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>65</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>58</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/66?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dangermen]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/66?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Is a picture worth a thousand words? Is the power of the photograph overlooked by                 many writers? In two articles, the BJR celebrates the roll of the photojournalist.                 Accomplished photographer Brennan writes: "Looking now at old news pictures and                 newsreels, I cannot believe my work and that of my now my equally ageing colleagues                 has become archive material. There was much criticism in the 70s and 80s of                 voyeurism, because of the harrowing images of war, particularly those from Vietnam                 from... many great, brave, photojournalists. That debate appears to have gone away.                 Now we are bombarded with images so graphic and instant that the pictures from that                 earlier time appear almost benevolent... And technology has allowed anyone to be a                 'citizen journalist'. Pictures from news events, sometimes taken from cell-phone                 cameras and usually of poor quality, fetch top dollar with major news organizations.                 Everyone is a 'news' photographer, triggering an influx by opportunist and mostly                 untalented snappers that some believe has sounded the death knell for great news                 photography. I don't believe that's the case. Technology has only enhanced the                 skills of the new breed of serious photojournalists." </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brennan, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808094202</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dangermen]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>71</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>66</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/72?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Blame it on Blow Up]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/2/72?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p> The veteran journalist and author recalls the highs and lows of working with                 newspaper photographers in the past, and concludes: "The staff photographers of                 today don't sing or joke much. They are an endangered species in a world teeming                 with civilians wielding digital cameras and celebrity-chasing amateurs looking for a                 big score. Breaking news pictures are increasingly the work of passers-by while the                 reduced staff teams are edged off the prime pages. There's a growing tendency to                 print the by-lines of those who do get their pictures published vertically, which I                 daresay is all right if you're Japanese. It's sad. I fear the parade's gone by and                 the only ones left cheering are the bean counters who grubstaked all those years of                 riotous assembly." </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davis, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808094204</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Blame it on Blow Up]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>78</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>72</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/79?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: All in the line of duty: The Remarkable Lives of Bill Deedes, by Stephen Robinson (Little, Brown, {pound}20, pp480)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/79?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808094205</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: All in the line of duty: The Remarkable Lives of Bill Deedes, by Stephen Robinson (Little, Brown, {pound}20, pp480)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>81</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/82?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Visual overkill: Reuters: Our World Now (Thames & Hudson, pp352, {pound}10)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/82?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacobson, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190021302</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Visual overkill: Reuters: Our World Now (Thames & Hudson, pp352, {pound}10)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>84</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>82</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/85?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Chinese treacle: Rupert's Adventure in China: How Murdoch lost a fortune and found a wife, byBruce Dover (Mainstream Publishing, 302 pp, {pound}18.99)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/85?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fenby, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190021303</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Chinese treacle: Rupert's Adventure in China: How Murdoch lost a fortune and found a wife, byBruce Dover (Mainstream Publishing, 302 pp, {pound}18.99)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>86</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/87?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Skiddy row: Forgive Us Our Press Passes, by Ian Skidmore (Revel Barker Publishing, pp222, {pound}9.95)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/87?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jameson, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190021304</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Skiddy row: Forgive Us Our Press Passes, by Ian Skidmore (Revel Barker Publishing, pp222, {pound}9.95)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>88</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/89?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Echo warrior: The Age of the Warrior: Selected Writings, by Robert Fisk (4th Estate, pp320, 14.99)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/89?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaronovitch, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190021305</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Echo warrior: The Age of the Warrior: Selected Writings, by Robert Fisk (4th Estate, pp320, 14.99)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>90</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/91?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Street scenes: Fleet Street -- the inside story of journalism, edited by Vivian Brodzky (Macdonald, 1966, pp219, original price unknown)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/91?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hagerty, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190021306</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Street scenes: Fleet Street -- the inside story of journalism, edited by Vivian Brodzky (Macdonald, 1966, pp219, original price unknown)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>93</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/93?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cudlipp Award winner]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/93?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190021307</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cudlipp Award winner]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>93</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>93</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/94?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Letters]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/94?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190021601</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Letters]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>95</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>94</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/96?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Entries invited for Paul Foot Award]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/2/96?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190021701</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Entries invited for Paul Foot Award]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>96</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>96</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial: British Journalism Review Trivia pursuit]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>'One of Nick Davies's informants for his book, Flat Earth News, is a trainee reporter                 on a regional daily tabloid, and he or she provides a diary of one 45½-hour working                 week. During it the reporter produced 48 stories of varying lengths and importance                 on the basis of only 26 conversations with informants, only four of whom were met                 face-to-face. Indeed, the reporter spent only three hours away from his desk,                 telephone and computer terminal, and most of the time was occupied in answering                 demands from the news desk to fill specific holes in the typical 24 pages of local                 news scheduled in each day's paper. The account suggests that much of this material                 is trivial and formulaic, to use no stronger terms...</p><p>What does the future hold if newspapers and broadcasters do not encourage young                 journalists by allowing them to exercise their skills by using their minds to ask                 questions and assess the answers sceptically, intelligently and knowledgeably?                 Poorly trained and with little news judgement, the executives of tomorrow will                 produce anodyne newspapers and bulletins because that is all they know. And as the                 paying public wake up to the realisation that the traditional media are turning into                 mere processors of pseudo-news, they will surely abandon them, happy to find the                 truth by weighing up for themselves the mixture of fact, opinion and craziness that                 compete with each other in the free-for-all of cyberspace. If Davies's trainee is a                 harbinger of the end of news journalism as we know it, the coroner's verdict can be                 nothing other than suicide.' </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808090188</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial: British Journalism Review Trivia pursuit]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/5?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Time to climb out of the sewer]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/5?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Award-winning Guardian reporter Leigh draws upon Nick Davies' new book, Flat Earth                 News, is examining the state of investigative journalism today and concluding: "The                 waters of British investigative journalism in 2008 certainly appear to be heavily                 polluted. But nonetheless, along with the tide of dead dogs, used condoms and toxic                 waste, there do seem to be nutritious public interest fish still to be caught.                 Liberty is indivisible, as the saying goes. And a free press is better than any of                 the alternatives." </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leigh, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808090189</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Time to climb out of the sewer]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>9</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/10?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The myth about Panorama]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/10?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Gaber looks at Panorama - the self-described "world's longest-running investigative                 TV show" - past and present, and writes: "This is a problematic way for a programme                 to brand itself. "The world's longest running..." has a slight feel of hubris about                 it and is almost impossible to prove. The line is also problematic because it                 describes Panorama as a "show" - it's a word that is probably indicative of the new                 style and philosophy of what, for most people interested in serious journalism, has                 always been, not a show, but a programme. But it's the bit in the middle,                 "investigative TV", that begs the biggest questions: is it, and was it ever?"</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaber, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808090190</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The myth about Panorama]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>14</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/15?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[People power]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/15?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Media commentator Greenslade examines the investigative history of The People - now                 down on its luck but once the greatest investigative popular paper of them all. And                 former head of investigations at the paper, Laurie Manifold recalls some of the                 great investigations of the past, while former reporter Fred Harrison sadly states                 that the culture of the paper changed and the tradition of investigatory journalism                 gradually vanished.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greenslade, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808090191</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[People power]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>21</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/22?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quotes of the Quarter]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/22?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808092162</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quotes of the Quarter]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>22</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/23?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ethnic Balance: Race against the tide]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/23?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Harker, assistant comment editor at The Guardian, argues that progress towards proper                 ethnic diversified staffs within the media - the press, especially - has been slow.                 The number of racial minorities in editing positions across all Fleet Street is                 tiny, he claims, and most of the main desks on the nationals - home, foreign, city,                 features, sports - are run by entirely white teams. Harker concludes: 'As newspapers                 face more and more intense competition, both in print and online, surely they can't                 afford to ignore Britain's growing minority population. The assumption that things                 can continue as they always have, with a wealthy well-connected elite handing down                 news from above, expecting their underlings to try to imitate them, just doesn't fit                 our 21st century profile. Ultimately, what surely we all want is for all sections of                 society to feel they are properly represented in the range, variety and balance of                 stories written about them... But how many newspaper organisations will genuinely                 commit themselves to reaching that goal?'</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harker, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808090192</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ethnic Balance: Race against the tide]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>31</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/32?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Way We Were: From the British Journalism Review of ten years ago (vol. 9, issue no 1,                 1998)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/32?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808092163</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Way We Were: From the British Journalism Review of ten years ago (vol. 9, issue no 1,                 1998)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>32</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/33?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Travel Journalism: The road to nowhere]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/33?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Travel specialist Moss reveals the home truths about travel journalism: how it has                 become swamped by celebrities and freeloading staff members and pays specialist                 writers poorly. Moss writes: "More overpaid amateur-celebrity stories and the grim                 proliferation of under-valued professional material through random media is worst of                 all worlds. The very best travel stories are a model of journalism. They entertain,                 they educate, (occasionally) they illuminate. The main contemporary issues - the                 environment, the cultural impact of travel, the economics of the tourist dollar, the                 horrors of globetrotting and the terror of airport and airplanes - should all                 command space among the upbeat copy on boutique hotels, delicious food, beautiful                 landscapes and unique cultures. This, I reckon, could be the model for television,                 too, and then there would be no more...celebrity pointlessness. Travel is, after                 defence, the second biggest industry on the planet. Does it really have to be the                 smallest kind of journalism?"</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moss, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808090193</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Travel Journalism: The road to nowhere]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>40</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/41?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tony Hall: Fighter pilot, enter stage left]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/41?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Interviewed by the editor, the former Head of News at the BBC and now executive                 director of the Royal Opera House, Tony Hall, talks for the first time about the                 events that led to Andrew Gilligan, Gavyn Davies and Greg Dyke leaving the                 Corporation and says that crises in television "have helped concentrate minds                 wonderfully" but that broadcasters must work overtime regain public trust. And as a                 non-executive director of Channel 4, he comments: "I believe that as a public                 service broadcaster we can do something that will really have an impact on people's                 lives. We can stand for something and I think that is really important. The debate                 about Channel 4 now is actually about public service provision, and about plurality                 of public service provision. I think it is inevitable, inevitable, that the licence                 fee will be contested - part of it will be contested - and that in the next five or                 six years Channel 4 will have a pitch at the licence fee [to obtain a share of it].                 The notion that there should be competition in the provision of public service                 broadcasting is absolutely fundamental - Channel 4 is there to add perspectives and                 an edge and to support new talent and new companies in a way that the BBC             doesn't."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hagerty, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808090194</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tony Hall: Fighter pilot, enter stage left]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>47</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>41</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/48?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Not guilty -- but who's to know?]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/48?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Media rivals swooped when Channel 4 faced another fakery scandal. How come they                 vanished when Dispatches was exonerated by Ofcom? asks the deputy Head of News and                 Current Affairs at Channel Four. Sutcliffe traces the history of the Channel's                 Dispatches programme "Undercover Mosque", shortly after the transmission of which                 West Midlands Police announced it was to investigate the extreme views and comments                 made in the film. Sutcliffe recalls how the police then decided to focus on                 potential offences that may have been committed by the programme makers. He                 comments: "Nine months after "Undercover Mosque" was broadcast, four months since                 the programme was the subject of a police ambush, Ofcom threw out the case put by                 the country's second largest police force... [But] 'Undercover Mosque' may have been                 given a ringing endorsement from Ofcom, Channel 4 and the producers at Hardcash may                 no longer have stood accused of being fakers and twisters, but we were no longer                 news... There was some pick-up but nowhere near the intensity of the interest when it                 looked as if we were in trouble. I felt the lukewarm press response to our victory                 had failed to dissipate the stench of fakery. The allegations lingered just off                 stage."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sutcliffe, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808090195</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Not guilty -- but who's to know?]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>56</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>48</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/57?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rogue elephant]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/57?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A new breed of editors has emerged with the development of web journalism. Tom                 Whitwell, communities editor of Times Online, is one of them and here describes life                 in the fast lane of the information super highway. He writes: "Traditional [media]                 power structures are unlikely to last for very much longer. I've never been a staff                 newspaper journalist, but I've always understood it to be a hierarchical,                 politically charged operation, where questions of right and wrong are answered by                 seniority. The online world is still as political as any office, but there's an                 elephant in the room that can't be ignored for long: In print, you often have no                 real idea what sells your newspaper. Online, you know exactly what's selling your                 site, live, 24 hours a day. So the editor can certainly pay his old school chum to                 write a jolly column about nothing much in particular. But it will be immediately                 obvious if nobody much in particular is reading it. Similarly, a youngster toiling                 in an unfashionable backwater who works hard and promotes his or her stuff online                 can find an audience. It doesn't matter that it's never promoted on the homepage,                 because traffic can be found elsewhere - from blogs or news aggregators or Google                 searches."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whitwell, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808090196</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rogue elephant]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>62</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/63?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The devil wears Primark]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/63?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The 20-year-old university student explains why, despite the problems of the                 industry, young people are still attracted to a career in newspaper journalism. She                 writes: "The truth is that my generation, more so than any before it, thrives on                 communication. The media - the big, official one where Jon Snow works and everyone                 wears sensible shoes - is becoming less of a distinct entity. Instead, each social                 group creates and maintains their own little media industry, distributing its                 information and ideas through blogging, social networking sites, communal texting,                 fanzines, flyering and occasionally wearing sandwich boards in the street. The end                 doesn't appear to be nigh for this kind of gossip circulation, and I think we can                 partly attribute the growing graduate interest in journalism to the tell-all                 communication culture. We are egotistical exhibitionists."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bravo, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808090197</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The devil wears Primark]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>68</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>63</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/69?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Last of the long goodbyes]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/69?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>With the break-up of Fleet Street, national newspapermen and women now rarely meet                 and the memorial services, when "The Street" blazes briefly back to life, have                 become almost like reunions for many old hacks, believes veteran columnist and                 executive Knight. But now even the camaraderie resumed at memorial/thanksgiving                 services and over the bottomless glasses afterwards is under threat: "These events                 are usually to honour veterans who have spent a lifetime in Fleet Street and often                 died while still working. The congregations are primarily composed of professional                 friends who have served and drunk with them. Apart from a respectable and, as time                 goes by, diminishing gaggle of young admirers, it's a dying breed." After the recent                 memorial service for five-times editor Richard Stott, a friend said to the author:                 "That's the last great piss up we're going to see in Fleet Street." Comments Knight:                 "I hope he was wrong."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knight, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808090198</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Last of the long goodbyes]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>73</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/74?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Cudlipp Award]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/74?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190011501</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Cudlipp Award]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>74</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>74</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/75?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Untamed, unbowed, undone: Public Service Television: World in Action 1963-98, by Peter Goddard, John Corner and Kay Richardson (Manchester University Press, pp240, {pound}15.99)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/75?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Macdonald, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474808090199</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Untamed, unbowed, undone: Public Service Television: World in Action 1963-98, by Peter Goddard, John Corner and Kay Richardson (Manchester University Press, pp240, {pound}15.99)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>77</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/77?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Shock and awful: Reporting Iraq, edited by Mike Hoyt, John Palattella and the staff of the Columbia Journalism Review (Melville House Publishing, pp189, $21.95)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/77?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnson, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190011202</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Shock and awful: Reporting Iraq, edited by Mike Hoyt, John Palattella and the staff of the Columbia Journalism Review (Melville House Publishing, pp189, $21.95)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>78</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>77</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/79?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Mind over matter: Guardian Style, by David Marsh (Guardian Books, pp362, {pound}14.99)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/79?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berry, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190011203</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Mind over matter: Guardian Style, by David Marsh (Guardian Books, pp362, {pound}14.99)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>80</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/81?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Women's warrior: Selective Memory, by Katharine Whitehorn (Virago, pp269, {pound}18.99)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/81?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Langdon, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190011204</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Women's warrior: Selective Memory, by Katharine Whitehorn (Virago, pp269, {pound}18.99)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>82</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/83?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Channel for flair]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/83?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snow, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190011205</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Channel for flair]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>84</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/85?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Lamb's tales: Small Wars Permitting: Dispatches from Foreign Lands, by Christina Lamb (Harper Press, pp390, {pound}8.99)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/85?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leapman, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190011206</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Lamb's tales: Small Wars Permitting: Dispatches from Foreign Lands, by Christina Lamb (Harper Press, pp390, {pound}8.99)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>86</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/87?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Power players: The Life and Death of the Press Barons, by Piers Brendon (Secker and Warburg 1982, pp288, {pound}12.50)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/1/87?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Delano, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748080190011207</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Power players: The Life and Death of the Press Barons, by Piers Brendon (Secker and Warburg 1982, pp288, {pound}12.50)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>88</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lord help us]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The current Director-General, Mark Thompson, and the BBC Trust may have had little                 room for manoeuvre after a licence-fee settlement that was less than expected, other                 than, as detailed in his "Delivering Creative Future" speech, of                 large-scale staff cuts, property sales and &ndash; crucially for BBC journalism                 &ndash; the integration of the news division. Yet, despite the title, the emphasis                 of the speech was managerial rather than creative... Behind the turmoil at the                 BBC is the unspoken menace of potential privatisation: there must be some managers                 who have an ambition, without admitting the fact to themselves or each other, to                 take the BBC brand into the stock market. Now, before it is too late, is the time to                 insist that the BBC is a public service corporation, its purpose to enrich the minds                 and lives of the nation.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807086949</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lord help us]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/5?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How to survive Rupert Murdoch]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/5?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Former Murdoch stable editor Dunn, now editor-in-chief of the New York Daily News,                 sets out the ground rules to be heeded by those at Murdoch&rsquo;s newly-acquired                 prize, the <I>Wall Street Journal</I>. Major changes are coming, warns Dunn:                 "Launching new sections for the <I>Journal</I>, introducing deeper and                 better coverage in key areas and improving the political coverage will only be part                 of it. What will be more interesting is his involvement on the business side of the                 <I>Journal</I>. At many of his publications around the world he knows that winning                 the editorial war is only part of the battle... Murdoch understands the war is                 waged on all fronts...Will the <I>Journal</I> succumb to such pressures? Will                 it maintain its independence and dignity in the face of being part of a global                 empire with so many interlocking and interdependent pieces? How the <I>Wall Street                 Journal</I> survives Rupert Murdoch will be one of the great media stories of the                 next decade." </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dunn, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807086950</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How to survive Rupert Murdoch]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>10</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/11?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clean-up in spin city]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/11?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The <I>Daily Mail</I> political columnist argues that new Prime Minister Gordon                 Brown has already restored some honesty to the political process. "He has                 (and deserves more credit for this than has so far been awarded) voluntarily                 relinquished some of his own ability to control the press by making newspapers less                 dependent on the Downing Street machine," he writes. "As a result                 reporting from Westminster feels cleaner. Stories can get written up for what they                 are worth, not fine-tuned to suit party political allegiances... Life is                 better. Spin is diminishing. Honest, unadulterated political reporting is making a                 reappearance... Maybe it can really last. With the coming of peace at the end                 of World War Two the great <I>Daily Mirror</I> cartoonist Philip Zec produced a                 famous drawing with the message: Don&rsquo;t Lose it Again. Exactly the same can be                 said of Fleet Street at the end of the era of Blair."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oborne, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807086951</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clean-up in spin city]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Great politicians rise above ridicule]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/19?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Lord Baker, vice-chairman of The Cartoon Museum and an expert in the field, traces                 the history of political lampooning from Robert Walpole to Gordon Brown and                 concludes that the best politicians take both criticism and praise with more than                 one pinch of sale: "Prime Ministers and politicians can be hurt by cartoons,                 but they should remember the cartoonist&rsquo;s role is not to couch favour or                 approval. They should ignore the ones that flatter and resist wincing at the ones                 that ridicule. If, at times, the attack does strike home, they should never let it                 show. The reputations of the real political giants have not been impaired by the                 images created by the cartoonists. Great politicians rise above the invective, no                 doubt sufficiently confident of their own reputation to allow their achievements to                 be judged by history, rather than by cartoons."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baker, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807086952</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Great politicians rise above ridicule]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>26</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/27?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Children and the media quicksand]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/27?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"With a missing child dominating the headlines this summer, and reports that                 due to obesity our children may not outlive their parents, the question of                 protecting the next generation is high on the news agenda," writes media                 lawyer Melville-Brown. "But it is not just the physical health and well-being                 of children that is at stake in our modern society. The public&rsquo;s appetite for                 news &ndash; serious or gossip &ndash; and photographic evidence of both, together                 with the media&rsquo;s preparedness to feed this hunger, is putting our children at                 risk of media over-exposure." So who, she asks, is looking after the                 children: parents, courts, government or the media? And concludes: "For their                 own very different reasons, they all must."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melville-Brown, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807086953</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Children and the media quicksand]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>32</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>27</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/33?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The crime beat is hard labour now]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/33?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Sky News crime correspondent insists that the good old days of crime reporting                 are gone forever. "For years our staple diet of murder, rape and armed                 robbery was occasionally supplemented by terror," he writes." Now                 terror overshadows everything and I&rsquo;m forever waiting for another attack,                 more arrests, a next court appearance or the latest trial opening. Keeping on top of                 all that requires contacts beyond the police... The glut of terror stories has                 sometimes put a strain on our relationship with police. Scotland Yard&rsquo;s                 counter-terror chief, Peter Clarke, used a speech this year to hit out over leaks                 that he said were endangering lives... There&rsquo;s a big difference of                 opinion among people I talk to: those who insist it&rsquo;s vital to keep terror                 plot details secret to avoid prejudicing the trial and those who believe the public                 has a right to know, as soon as possible, what atrocities are being planned against them."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brunt, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807086954</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The crime beat is hard labour now]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>38</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/39?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[War watchdogs or lapdogs?]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/39?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Academics Moorcraft and Taylor argue that it does not matter if journalists rarely                 have the political impact some of them think they possess, especially in war zones:                 "Let them believe that if it helps it keeps them to keep going. They can                 still be witnesses, recording the first draft of history with all its flaws. Taking                 a long view, there will always be friction in wartime between the media and the                 military. It is in every democratic citizen&rsquo;s interest that this is                 so." The role of the war correspondent has changed radically over the years,                 but is still a vital one, they claim: "The BBC&rsquo;s Alan Little was more                 pessimistic on the role of journalist as moral witness: &lsquo;A lot of us,                 especially in Bosnia, thought that the effect of our being there and bearing witness                 would have a beneficial effect, would in fact change things. In fact, it                 didn&rsquo;t change anything.&rsquo; But journalists were there to record what                 happened in some places some of the time. Some of the horrors were recorded. That is                 the prime directive of the craft. Until the very last days of the Second World War,                 no foreign journalist recorded Auschwitz for the outside world. At least the                 concentration camps in Bosnia were filmed early in the Balkan wars. No-one could                 say, "We didn&rsquo;t know."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moorcraft, P., Taylor, P. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807086955</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[War watchdogs or lapdogs?]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>50</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>39</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/51?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fifty years on, God's still smiling]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/51?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Interviewed by the editor, the rector of St Bride&rsquo;s, Fleet Street, reflects on                 the turbulent history of the church as it celebrates the fiftieth anniversary of its                 rededication after suffering massive bomb damage in the Second World War. And he                 observes of the sometimes flimsy relationship between the newspaper industry and                 religion: "You might ask what this secular, sometimes pretty disreputable                 trade got to do with the Christian faith, but people working in the industry and                 working under pressure are stressed in their working lives and sometimes in their                 private lives sometimes. They need a spiritual anchor point. They need a place where                 they feel they can be absolutely themselves whatever else is going on and where they                 can come and feel understood, because I think although people see the public role of                 newspapers, they don&rsquo;t understand all the internal pressures...they                 don&rsquo;t always realise the cost of the end product in terms of stress and                 emotion. So newspapermen and women sometimes feel quite isolated. I feel the                 industry hugely values somewhere where they feel they belong, where they are                 understood and welcomed just as they are. And where God looks down on them with a                 smile. And on St Bride&rsquo;s, too."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meara, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807086956</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fifty years on, God's still smiling]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>55</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/56?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quotes of the Quarter]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/56?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748070180041301</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quotes of the Quarter]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>56</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>56</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/57?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breaking eggs in Iran]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/57?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The writer spend four years in Iran working as a foreign correspondent for the                     <I>Financial Times</I> and here reports that "Western readers and                 listeners are unaware of the constraints under which their information on Iran has                 been produced. While the number of resident reporters in the country is low and                 falling, many outlets retain the dateline by sending visiting hacks who hire                 quasi-official minders through Ershad. Even the resident reporter finds it hard to                 gain access to anyone or any place remotely near a real story, although to admit                 this to editors is dangerous when they are desperate to know what is going on in the                 &lsquo;axis of evil&rsquo;." He concludes: "Hard facts have a way,                 sometimes, of confounding both propaganda and inaccurate and malicious reporting.                 Lessons can be learned, and the truth can be recognised. But one thing is clear. If                 it comes to a U.S. or U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran, Western readers and listeners are                 likely to be even worse prepared than they were for the invasion of Iraq." </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smyth, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807086957</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breaking eggs in Iran]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>62</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/63?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Truth and nothing like the truth]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/63?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The term "Hawthorne Effect" is now widely accepted by social                 scientists, and is defined by the Oxford Dictionary of Sociology as "The                 behaviour modifying effect of being the subject of social investigation", and                 the writer suggests that this is something journalists need to be aware of, because                 it threatens to undermine one of our primary tools: the interview. Is the process of                 interviewing itself altering the answers we receive in interviews? If the Hawthorne                 Effect is distorting the information we relay to the public in some way, it is our                 business to know about it. "We must acknowledge the existence of the                 Hawthorne Effect and integrate the term into our journalistic discourses, debates                 and training programmes," she writes. "We must realise that part of                 what it means to be a good journalist is to be able to understand the Hawthorne                 Effect, to learn how to employ it when it enriches our journalism and safeguard                 against it when it threatens to undermine our work."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davis, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807086958</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Truth and nothing like the truth]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>67</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>63</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/68?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The way we were]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/68?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748070180041401</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The way we were]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>68</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>68</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/69?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Journey's end]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/69?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Bill Deedes, reporter, editor, columnist, Cabinet minister and decorated war hero,                 died on August 17 at the age of 94. In tribute to a journalistic icon, the British                 Journalism Review recalls Lord Deedes&rsquo; own memories of lifetime love affair                 with newspapers by publishing an extract from his 1997 memoir, <I>Dear Bill</I>                 (Macmillan). The extract concludes: "We go this way only once, and there                 seems so little time in which to explore the world and its wonders, to find out more                 about the human tragedy &ndash; or, as I more often find it, the human comedy                 &ndash; of which we are part. &lsquo;Never forget,&rsquo; the Austrian poet Rilke                 said to his wife as he lay dying, &lsquo;life is magnificent,&rsquo; and that is                 right. I believe there is a future life, but I do not let that discourage me from                 trying to get the most out of this one." </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deedes, W.F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807086959</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Journey's end]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>79</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/80?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Paul Foot Award/ Michael Rowntree obituary]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/80?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748070180041601</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Paul Foot Award/ Michael Rowntree obituary]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>80</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>80</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/81?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Sport journalism: a funny old game: Sports Journalism: A Multimedia Primer, by Rob Steen (Routledge, pp202, {pound}70 hardback, {pound}21.99 paperback, {pound}21.99 + VAT e-book)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/81?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Engel, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807086960</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Sport journalism: a funny old game: Sports Journalism: A Multimedia Primer, by Rob Steen (Routledge, pp202, {pound}70 hardback, {pound}21.99 paperback, {pound}21.99 + VAT e-book)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>82</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/83?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Course language: The Language of the News, by Martin Conboy (Routledge, pp213, {pound}60 hardback, {pound}17.99 paperback)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/83?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Humphrys, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748070180041202</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Course language: The Language of the News, by Martin Conboy (Routledge, pp213, {pound}60 hardback, {pound}17.99 paperback)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>84</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/85?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Bear facts: The Universal Journalist, by David Randall (Pluto Press, pp245, {pound}15.99)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/85?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leslie, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748070180041203</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Bear facts: The Universal Journalist, by David Randall (Pluto Press, pp245, {pound}15.99)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>86</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/87?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Swamp fever: Wicked Whispers: Confessions of a 3am Gossip Queen, byJessica Callan (Michael Joseph, pp352, {pound}16.99)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/87?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reed, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748070180041204</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Swamp fever: Wicked Whispers: Confessions of a 3am Gossip Queen, byJessica Callan (Michael Joseph, pp352, {pound}16.99)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>88</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/89?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Radio 4's wars: Life on Air: A History of Radio 4, by David Hendy (Oxford University Press, pp518, {pound}25)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/89?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maddox, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748070180041205</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Radio 4's wars: Life on Air: A History of Radio 4, by David Hendy (Oxford University Press, pp518, {pound}25)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>90</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/91?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Sleeping partners: The Triumph of the Political Class, by Peter Oborne (Simon & Schuster, pp390, {pound}18.99)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/91?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Routledge, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748070180041206</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Sleeping partners: The Triumph of the Political Class, by Peter Oborne (Simon & Schuster, pp390, {pound}18.99)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>92</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/93?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Wintour wonderland: Pressures on the Press: An Editor Looks at Fleet Street, by Charles Wintour (1972 Andre Deutsch, pp276, {pound}3.50)]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/93?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berry, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748070180041207</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Wintour wonderland: Pressures on the Press: An Editor Looks at Fleet Street, by Charles Wintour (1972 Andre Deutsch, pp276, {pound}3.50)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>94</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>93</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/95?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Letters]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/4/95?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, F. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748070180041501</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Letters]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>96</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>95</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[British Journalism Review: Trust or bust]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Following the recent series of problems that have assaulted the television industry                 &ndash; including faked phone-ins and the misinformation concerning Annie                 Leibowitz&rsquo;s photographic session with the Queen &ndash; an uphill task faces                 practitioners who want to earn renewed trust from the public. There are also issues                 of governance. The House of Lords Communications Select Committee hit a nail on the                 head at the beginning of August by pointing out that it is no longer clear who is                 ultimately responsible for the BBC, or what the role of the chairman of the BBC                 Trust is. He has regulatory responsibilities towards the Corporation while also                 being expected to act as its chairman, and the new Charter says that                 "Chairman of the BBC" is only an honorary title. British television is                 in a mess and needs quickly to put its house in order if it is ever to regain respect.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807083671</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[British Journalism Review: Trust or bust]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/6?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quotes of the Quarter]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/6?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748070180032001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quotes of the Quarter]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>6</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/7?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Try a little tenderness]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/7?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Since walking away from presenting the lunchtime news on BBC1 some 15 months ago, she                 has watched with the concern of a caring mother for her offspring as the Corporation                 lurched from one calamity to another. She has monitored, too, what she sees as the                 increasing ageism of British television, the downward spiral of journalistic                 standards, and the shabby treatment of young professionals setting out along                 medialand&rsquo;s streets of adventure. But she has kept such thoughts largely to                 herself. Now she has agreed to talk, highly articulately, and with what sounds like                 regret rather than anger, about the problems of an industry into which she first                 stumbled 33 years ago. "It used to be that people would give their eye-teeth                 to work for the BBC," she says. "And the standards were very high and                 the level of intelligence of the people who were commissioning editors or                 controllers of the channels was very high. And it wasn&rsquo;t just intelligence                 &ndash; they cared about the people who worked for them. I think the managerial                 skills of these highly intelligent young people who run the BBC now are very poor. I                 can tell you there is an atmosphere of fear, based on the fact that people have very                 short contracts, and the youngsters are pushed and pushed and pushed. You no longer                 see people smiling when they work on news programmes." And she believes                 complaints about the "dumbing down" of British TV are justified                 &ndash; "I must sound very old fashioned when I use the word vulgarity, but                 we are constantly seeing people on screen who are of low intelligence and low                 education and whose views on everything seem to be made very important. As for                 ageism, everybody in our society should be presented on screen. How many presenters                 do you know on television who are over the age of 60? ...There are more than 16                 million people in this country over the age of 55 and they are poorly                 represented... I don&rsquo;t think the BBC is intent on making programmes for them."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hagerty, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807083673</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Try a little tenderness]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>16</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/17?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Where are the new Carlton Greenes?]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/17?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The former chairman of Granada Television believes overall standards of television                 news journalism have slipped and writes: "With the 24-hour news channels, the                 volume and accessibility of news has increased enormously but, with just two                 exceptions, the Channel 4 News and <I>Newsnight</I>, standards have dropped. The                 main bulletins still cover major stories well &ndash; bomb plots, floods, high                 diplomacy &ndash; but for the rest there is too much trivia, too many soft features                 and little wit, for the whimsical little exchanges between presenters usually                 embarrass rather than amuse. Too much time is given to the reporting of routine                 crimes plus murders, rapes and kidnaps complete with the stolid police report and                 the sobbing parents. Sections of news bulletins sometimes resemble a police gazette.                 Alongside coverage of the war zones and the Middle East, Africa is given a lot of                 time, China and Russia little or none. Presenters are efficient, but with the                 notable exception of Jon Snow and Jeremy Paxman lack the charisma and the status of                 their predecessors." And Sir Denis concludes: "When we veterans                 venture an opinion on contemporary television we are told that our experience of                 television of the past is not relevant to the television of today. Of course the                 change is great, but there are principles of broadcasting that endure, and one such                 principle, and it is not always observed today, is this: the first priority of any                 broadcasting organisation is to give its programme people the best possible                 conditions for making programmes. Quick decisions, short lines of communication,                 proper funding, strong personal relationships, bold leadership. No committees, no                 bureaucracy, no focus groups and no interference from business management. For it is                 the directors, writers and producers who are the most important people in television                 &ndash; and if you want good programmes, their interests <I>must</I> come first."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forman, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807083674</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Where are the new Carlton Greenes?]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>23</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/24?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The way we were]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/24?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748070180032101</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The way we were]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>24</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/25?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Foodie? Or not foodie?]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/25?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Following <I>Sunday Times</I> restaurant critic A A Gill&rsquo;s strident attack                 on theatre reviewers, Charles Spencer, drama critic of <I>The Daily Telegraph</I>,                 hits back by examining the work of some of the many restaurant reviewers crowding                 the pages of the daily and Sunday national newspapers. He writes: "Restaurant                 reviewers tend to divide into those who might be described as the serious foodies,                 who fill you up with lots of hard facts and background info, and the ego-trippers,                 who use their notices largely as an excuse for personal rumination, slabs of                 autobiography and jokes... By and large restaurant reviewers are a bone-idle bunch.                 With the exception of Fay Maschler, in the London <I>Evening Standard</I>, who                 usually goes to three restaurants a week, they confine themselves to just one                 establishment. In contrast, theatre critics on daily newspapers are usually out                 four, five and sometimes six times a week, while Sunday reviewers will cover at                 least three shows and often more. The restaurant reviewers&rsquo; far from                 Stakhanovite approach to the task in hand increases my puritanical suspicion that                 restaurant writing isn&rsquo;t an entirely serious form of journalism but just a                 jammy way of getting paid to eat posh grub for free."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spencer, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807083675</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Foodie? Or not foodie?]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>32</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/33?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The media as peacemakers]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/33?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Journalist and academic Neill argues that the media deserves great credit for                 assisting the peace process in Northern Ireland. During the Troubles,                 "reporters and analysts did their best to present an accurate account of                 events and a balance of opinions despite dirty tricks employed by all participants.                 Most of the journalists recognised they were prisoners of history and verifiable                 truth was a casualty of conflict. It was broadcasting which brought the truth about                 life under a Stormont regime to the attention of the world." The current                 situation is more problematical, he believes: "When Northern Ireland last had                 devolved government the Stormont press pack had diversity and hunger. Every major                 media company on both sides of the border, from the republican <I>Irish Press</I>                 to the unionist <I>News Letter</I>, employed experienced staff to report and                 analyse the decision-making. Today&rsquo;s press pack is much smaller and runs the                 risk of becoming spoon-fed, greatly outnumbered as it is by Government press                 officers and party lobbyists. But, he concludes, "that is now and then was                 then and recognition of the contribution to peace made by the media and their                 journalists in Northern Ireland is long overdue. The most fitting tribute would be                 vigorous, daily reporting of the Assembly &ndash; if truth is the first casualty of                 war, proper scrutiny must not become the first casualty of peace." </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neill, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807083676</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The media as peacemakers]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>37</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/38?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feral? Why Blair wasn't all wrong]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/38?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Former long-serving political editor of the BBC, Cole suggests that Blair&rsquo;s                 attach on the British media &ndash; made in a speech as he prepared to vacate 10                 Downing Street &ndash; was to a certain extent justified. "The recent burst                 of breast-beating about the loss of trust in the media has mostly been concentrated                 on broadcasting," writes Cole. "But when you consider how many                 newspaper &lsquo;scoops&rsquo; are not followed up by other papers, or even by the                 originator of the story, how many are never heard of again, you wonder whether trust                 in the printed word is being similarly eroded. Much of the blame for all this is put                 down to &lsquo;spin&rsquo;. Certainly the public relations trade, in which I                 include focus groups and public opinion polls, and not only in politics, but in                 business, the entertainment industry, and even charities, has gained an unenviable                 reputation for perverting the truth on behalf of its clients. This is where Tony                 Blair&rsquo;s criticism of media obsession with &lsquo;impact&rsquo; rings bells.                 Non-governmental organisation, charities, university researchers have all learned                 that the first sentence of their press release must contain a story. Sometime it is                 hyped. When I was news editor and deputy editor of <I>The Guardian</I>, we were                 very reluctant to print a story that claimed a forthcoming cure for cancer, lest it                 raised false hopes in patients and their families. Nowadays, researchers seem to                 claim cures for everything down to in-growing toenails, and gain publicity for                 them... The media do not operate in a vacuum. If we wonder why life is more                 strident today, we must look at others, including politicians, but also at                 ourselves. We have some kind of duty to truth, so far as we can discover what the                 truth is. But are we taking on the malignant forces that impede the search for truth                 as often as we ought?"</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cole, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807083678</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feral? Why Blair wasn't all wrong]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>44</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>38</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/45?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Life and death in party city]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/45?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>An experienced international correspondent, Kingstone returns from Afghanistan to                 report on the problems of the media there: "Neither the Government nor the                 public understands what freedom of the press means... The idea that it is the                 responsibility of the fledgling media to hold the Government accountable for its                 actions and also for the media to be held accountable for what it writes is                 unfathomable. Afghan journalists are intimidated and are vulnerable in ways that                 Western journalists can only imagine, so the independence, freedom and diversity are                 extremely fragile concepts." And she concludes: "If                 Afghanistan&rsquo;s journalism is to flourish &ndash; and it&rsquo;s a big if                 &ndash; among the issues it has to look at are convincing the police and other law                 enforcement bodies that the media is something to be protected, not muzzled or                 manipulated... The Government has to improve its strategic communications and                 resist the temptation to blame the messenger. A credible public broadcaster needs to                 emerge, the funding and manipulation of media from abroad decreased, and a solid                 advertising market to emerge on the back of a flourishing private sector. In an                 insecure situation, the media faces a similar challenge to almost anyone and                 anything else in this country &ndash; simply to survive."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kingstone, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807083679</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Life and death in party city]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>50</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/51?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Action replay]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/51?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 <I>Breaking News</I>, an engrossing volume of facts, figures, anecdotes,                 historical trivia, high drama and compelling narrative, tracks the history of the                 great American agency, AP, from its birth in 1846. What was originally a                 groundbreaking telegraph-based news syndicate for the press has developed into a                 multimedia global digital network supplying outlets world wide with high-speed                 information. But it is as an advertisement for the trade of journalism that the book                 functions best, with many pictures of correspondents in action most surely that will                 fire the imagination of students everywhere. Randomly chosen for their composition                 and impact, the two photographs reproduced bridge the end of the Second World War                 and the mess that was developing in Vietnam towards the late 1960s. Photographer                 Henry Griffin is the cine cameraman at work in Berlin after the city was captured by                 the Soviet army in May 1945, and correspondent Kelly Smith, from the Agency&rsquo;s                 Washington bureau, is shown aboard a Huey helicopter over the Central Highlands of                 Vietnam in August 1967. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807083757</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Action replay]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>53</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/54?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Training: a matter of degrees]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/54?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Bull, a careers consultant and <I>author of the</I> NCTJ Essential Guide to Careers                 in Journalism, belies degrees in media studies not properly equip students for a                 career in journalism and observes: I should say that I have absolutely no problem                 with media studies degrees as long as it is made clear to those who embark on one                 that it will probably not lead to a job as a journalist. I have no problem with                 media studies, just as I would have no problem with an alternative course to                 medicine called medical studies, in which students learn all about medical history                 and models of health provision but don&rsquo;t actually get to treat patients.                 Where I would have a problem is if a graduate of such a course assured me he could                 take my appendix out, or set my broken leg in plaster. I also have a problem with                 degrees that are labelled journalism but which are not vocational, and which do not                 equip graduates with a good chance of gaining a job in the trade." Bull                 continues: "There are those who will say I am being far too harsh on media                 studies degrees &ndash; that the best of them turn out graduates who go on to have                 sparkling careers in the media. I am sure this is true. Nevertheless, it is my                 experience that most editors do not trust such degrees and much prefer recruiting                 from industry-accredited courses."</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bull, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807083680</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Training: a matter of degrees]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>59</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>54</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/60?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[News]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/60?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/09564748070180032201</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[News]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>60</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>60</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/61?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sex, lies and audio tape]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/61?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Commission to look into the trafficking of children out of orphanages and into sex                 work in Thailand for a radio programme, Thembi Mutch embarks on a hazardous                 adventure &ndash; a friend working with Keren refugees on the Thai-Burma border                 tells her, "The police are as much a part of the problem as the armed pimps                 who control the kids and the traffickers. You will be taking bodyguards,                 won&rsquo;t you?" The story moves to Cambodia and she discovers,                 "Lying is huge issue. When I reach Phnom Penh I am lying more on a daily                 basis than I ever have in my life: about my name, my job, my hotel, my nationality                 and what I&rsquo;m doing. This is for two reasons: Cambodia&rsquo;s oral culture                 is steeped in suspicion, rumours, smoke and mirrors. The legacy of the Khmer Rouge                 and grassing people up has left deep residual scars: the preceding civil war and the                 subsequent war with Vietnam have done nothing to engender trust and a community                 spirit. It makes me realise I can&rsquo;t afford to let even the hotel staff know                 what I am doing. The other reason for all my lying is that the few people who do                 know about my project have advised strongly against being open, particularly in                 Cambodia, where it costs only $50 to hire a hit man and get rid of                 troublemakers." Because of intimidation and the reluctance of those involved                 to tell the truth, the project ultimately fails &ndash; but Mutch is now hoping to                 develop the idea for television.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mutch, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807083677</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sex, lies and audio tape]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>65</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>61</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/66?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Media wars in Latin America]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/66?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>South America veteran journalist O&rsquo;Shaughnessy reports:" During the                 Cold War the opponents of reform throughout Latin America, fearing the loss of their                 privileges that any change in the status quo would bring about...set aside                 arguments that the fight against poverty would put money into the pockets of those                 who did not have any, expand the market and thus benefit local and international                 trade, allowing everyone to gain. And their self-seeking views were well received in                 Western capitals. Many in Washington and London favoured dictators who claimed to be                 fighting for what they called "Western Christian civilisation":                 Anastasio Somoza in Nicaragua, Alfredo Stroessner in Paraguay, Augusto Pinochet in                 Chile, Leopoldo Galtieri in Argentina and the assorted generals in Brazil."                 And now "those opponents of change can no longer employ Cold War arguments                 and have had to find new ways of fighting the battle against reform. They have                 decided to try and deny the reformers legitimacy and strip them of their authority,                 using the media as frontline combat troops." The media that support the cause                 of reform are weak, he says, consisting as they do of few newspapers and even fewer                 television channels, and with continuing struggles about poverty, wealth and                 semantics in Latin America, there is no sign these media tensions will end any time soon.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[O'Shaughnessy, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807083681</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Media wars in Latin America]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>72</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>66</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/73?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nightmare on Oxford Street]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/3/73?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Veteran reporter Davis recalls how a minor case of shoplifting in London&rsquo;s                 Oxford Street, when a woman left a store without paying for five gaily-coloured                 hats, turned into a major story that tested Fleet Street&rsquo;s finest. The                 accused was identified as Nina Ponomareva, aged 27, a teacher and mother of a                 two-year-old boy named Sasha &ndash; a white beret listed in the charge was meant                 for him. "So far, so routine... But, unfortunately for all, Nina was                 also one of the Soviet Union&rsquo;s most famous women, a world-class athlete who                 at the 1952 summer Olympics in Helsinki had taken gold for discus throwing. Fondly                 nicknamed Miss Muscles, she was in London with almost 100 other Russian athletes to                 compete against the British in a two-day meeting at the White City, due to begin the                 next evening." Summoned to appear before magistrates and headlined                 &lsquo;Nina of the Five Hats&rsquo;, the discus genius&rsquo;s non-appearance in                 court set off a chain of events that Involved the Russian chargé d&rsquo;affaires,                 Lord Reading, minister of state at the Foreign Office, and the august British                 ambassador in Moscow, Sir William Hayter (Winchester and New College, Oxford), who                 "was infuriated to be summoned to the Kremlin to be harangued over this                 piddling business." Davis reveals the whole hilarious story.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davis, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807083715</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nightmare on Oxford Street]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>80</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/81?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Campbell's vivid Pepys show]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/81?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haines, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0956474807083682</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Campbell's vivid Pepys show]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>83</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/18/3/83?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Wapping's Boadicea]]></title>
<link>http://bjr.sagepub.co